JM

03 / Professional caseCustomer & Reputation Intelligence

One review is an opinion. Many, together, are a pattern.

I analysed the reputation and experience of an education company, bringing together media, social, digital conversation and reviews from several locations. Today I follow its monitoring.

Client
Education company · via ATREVIA
My role
Multichannel reputation and experience analysis
Period analysed
2024–2026, several locations
Sources
Media, social, digital conversation, Trustpilot and Google Reviews

Personal reconstruction. The company isn’t named. Topics and examples are fictional: they show the method, not results.

01 / Practical caseFictional example

With one source, everything looks important. With five, the pattern appears.

Each source sees one part. In reviews, people write when they’re very happy or very angry; in the media, whoever has something to say. Switch sources on and watch which topics repeat.

A single source: everything weighs the same and you can’t tell what repeats.

  • Student support

    Google ReviewsIsolated signal
  • Enrolment process

    Google ReviewsIsolated signal
  • Price and financing

    No data yet
  • Quality of classes

    Google ReviewsIsolated signal
  • Career prospects

    No data yet
  • Facilities at each location

    Google ReviewsIsolated signal
  • Brand image

    No data yet
  • Online platform

    No data yet

Matches in 3 or moreRepeats or isolatedGap: nobody mentions it

02 / The challenge

The customer’s voice arrives in pieces: a news story, a comment on social media, a review of one specific location. And one location doesn’t speak for all of them.

The work is putting the pieces together without losing where each one comes from.

What do voices that arrive separately tell us together?

03 / Methodology

Many voices, one joint reading.

  1. Listen

    Media, social, digital conversation and reviews from each location.

  2. Understand

    Each mention with its topic, sentiment, source and location.

  3. Decide

    What drives sentiment, where the friction is and which opportunities appear.

  4. Build

    A full analysis and, after that, monitoring that repeats.

04 / Patterns

Agreement, difference and gaps.

Agreement

The same topic shows up in sources that don’t talk to each other.

Fictional exampleSupport during enrolment comes up in reviews, on social media and in forums.

Difference

One source tells a different story. There’s usually something there.

Fictional exampleIn the media, a good image. In one location’s reviews, day-to-day friction.

Gap

What nobody mentions also says something.

Fictional exampleHardly anyone talks about the online platform. Does it work well, or does nobody use it?

05 / My role

My part is listening well and synthesising.

What I do

  • I gather and organise what’s said in each source.
  • I classify it by topic, sentiment and location.
  • I spot what drives sentiment, the friction points and the opportunities.
  • Today I take part in the recurring monitoring and reporting.

What I don’t claim

  • Changes to the experience or improvements in reputation.
  • The company’s decisions.

06 / Decision value

Going from ‘we got a bad review’ to ‘this is what keeps coming up, and this is where it hurts.’

Learning

What isn’t said is data too.